![]() ![]() See: The monograph presents multi-disciplinary evidences and argues that linga and Śiva as aniconic and iconic forms are a Trans-Eurasian phenomenon and NOT restricted to an exclusivist Draviḍa द्रविड़ sub-identity of questionable explicatory value to reconstruct pre-historic evolution of cultures in the expansive contact region, from early Bronze Age era, say, from ca. high linga of Candi Sukuh are exquisite and precise, explanatory narratives of Itihāsa of Bhāratam Janam. ![]() The sculptures, bas-reliefs and hieroglyphs on inscriptions such as the ones on the 1.82m. early identity of Bhāratam Janam as metal casters (the term is mentioned by Viśvamitra in Rigveda, identifying a group of people, apparently referring to all the people of his time in the civilization/culture contact area). trans-Eurasian presence of Meluhha hieroglyphs, and 3. ![]() evidence of Indian sprachbund (language union), 2. This act of deliverance is celebrated by recounting 1. To render a narrative, an Itihāsa of Bhāratam Janam, it is also imperative to re-evaluate the contributions made by Bhāratam Janam in the Hinduised states of the Far East (to borrow the phrase used by the French Epigraphist, George Coedes in his magnum opus: Histoire ancienne desEtats hindouises d'Extreme-Orient, 1944 (Ancient History of the Hinduised States of Far East). An evaluation of the written or sculpted representations of Mahadeva Śiva removes mists of Draviḍa māyā द्रविड़ माया which have so far rendered a false द्रविड़ identity, vivisecting the essential unity in the gestalt (whole nature of a phenomenon, apart from mere form or shape) and historical identity of Bhāratam Janam. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |